Also is Taker as tall as Khali or is he shorter?
11 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Subscribe
The Great Khali
the great indian WWE wrestler
Categories:
Subscribe
taker is shorter, and it pisses me off
Undertaker is smaller but not that much smaller. Undertaker and Khali have stood face to face and there wasn’t that much of a difference. The undertaker is 6ft10.5 in and Khali is 7ft 3 inch. But Undertaker is still tall compared to other wrestlers.
But Undertaker is by far the better wrestler.
taker is shorter than khali
I don’t think Undertaker’s considered a giant,I think you have to be over 7ft. to be one?!But I’m not sure!!Undertaker is a bit shorter than Khali!!
No he is a tiny cruiserweight.
Taker is shorter. Khali is a giant. Big Show is right up there.
Taker is shorter
PLZ ANSWER:http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvnBU_Q1BjC6ZxTeT_ffcWXsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20080714223125AAtDKia
WWE big men:
Great Khali – 7’3″
Big Show – 7’0″
Kane – 7’0″
Undertaker – 6’10.5″
Big Daddy V – 6’9″
Vladimir Koslov – 6’8″
From the medical viewpoint, there two two types of giants: those who normally proportioned, and those who suffer from acromegaly (a pituitary condition which results in abnormal bone and tissue growth). Big Show and Khali are acromegalic; Big Show had corrective surgery to stop growing. Kane and Undertaker are proportioned normal for their height; Big Daddy V is too, but is obese.
No he’s shorter
great kahli is 7ft3 , the undertaker is 10ft5 but the undertaker can beat anybody
The Undertaker is tall but the Great Khali is way taller!